<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for the professional appreciator</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ericjnies.com/wordpress/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ericjnies.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>&#34;You, the critic, the professional appreciator . . .&#34; -- High Fidelity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 17:37:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Let&#8217;s Talk Gay Marriage by Eric</title>
		<link>http://ericjnies.com/wordpress/?p=2224#comment-86920</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 17:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ericjnies.com/wordpress/?p=2224#comment-86920</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t you know it.  I completely agree he is no better than Obama on this issue . . . on most issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t you know it.  I completely agree he is no better than Obama on this issue . . . on most issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Let&#8217;s Talk Gay Marriage by Justin Huck</title>
		<link>http://ericjnies.com/wordpress/?p=2224#comment-86918</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Huck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 17:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ericjnies.com/wordpress/?p=2224#comment-86918</guid>
		<description>So full of Christian love!  You know, Romeny used to be a fan of gay marriage too.  That is, until, his political ambition led him to make a &quot;crass, calculated move to gain campaign contributions&quot; and support, I might add.  You are going to have a heckava time deciding who to vote for in 2012, aren&#039;t you? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So full of Christian love!  You know, Romeny used to be a fan of gay marriage too.  That is, until, his political ambition led him to make a &#8220;crass, calculated move to gain campaign contributions&#8221; and support, I might add.  You are going to have a heckava time deciding who to vote for in 2012, aren&#8217;t you? <img src='http://ericjnies.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Short John le Carré Pangyeric (and a Rant) by Em</title>
		<link>http://ericjnies.com/wordpress/?p=2145#comment-80013</link>
		<dc:creator>Em</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 11:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ericjnies.com/wordpress/?p=2145#comment-80013</guid>
		<description>You DO know that the writers made it a point to ask Le Carre if it was okay to make Peter gay, right?
Le Carre approved because he saw it was a great nod to the many homosexuals in MI6 at the time, and thought it was quite a realistic change.
I love the books, love the Alec Guiness version .. and I have to say .. this film does not disappoint. It&#039;s incredibly smart and sophisticated, and Gary Oldman is brilliant. He may not look like &#039;our&#039; Smiley, but everything else is spot on.
Watch the film. I&#039;m sure you&#039;ll love it. It&#039;s a very respectful adaptation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You DO know that the writers made it a point to ask Le Carre if it was okay to make Peter gay, right?<br />
Le Carre approved because he saw it was a great nod to the many homosexuals in MI6 at the time, and thought it was quite a realistic change.<br />
I love the books, love the Alec Guiness version .. and I have to say .. this film does not disappoint. It&#8217;s incredibly smart and sophisticated, and Gary Oldman is brilliant. He may not look like &#8216;our&#8217; Smiley, but everything else is spot on.<br />
Watch the film. I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll love it. It&#8217;s a very respectful adaptation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Short John le Carré Pangyeric (and a Rant) by Eric</title>
		<link>http://ericjnies.com/wordpress/?p=2145#comment-79128</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ericjnies.com/wordpress/?p=2145#comment-79128</guid>
		<description>le Carre is in the movie?  Well then I have to see it!  And I agree &#039;A Perfect Spy&#039; is the best of his books I&#039;ve read.  It is just compelling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>le Carre is in the movie?  Well then I have to see it!  And I agree &#8216;A Perfect Spy&#8217; is the best of his books I&#8217;ve read.  It is just compelling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Short John le Carré Pangyeric (and a Rant) by winslow</title>
		<link>http://ericjnies.com/wordpress/?p=2145#comment-79126</link>
		<dc:creator>winslow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ericjnies.com/wordpress/?p=2145#comment-79126</guid>
		<description>You shouldn&#039;t let the slight rewrite of the Guillam character prevent you from seeing  the movie. It&#039;s a v. minor thing. Besides, if you look carefully, you&#039;ll see le Carre himself in the movie, partying. The movie is a wonderful evocation of the 1970s; so much brown, for instance!

Also, make sure to read A Perfect Spy, which is his best book, most would agree. It is largely autobiographical and very moving and wonderfully written. Philip Roth is on record as saying it&#039;s the best postwar novel in English, or some such.  

And finally, do whatever it takes to find a copy of the original BBC productions of Tinker, Tailor and Smiley&#039;s People. They run around 5 hours but they are easily the best &quot;TV&quot; you will ever see. I&#039;ve watched them both 15 times and still enjoy every minute. The new Tinker movie, as le Carre himself said, has boiled down the ox into a bouillon cube, and in so doing, it has removed much of the characterization that makes the original story so rich. If you know the book, you&#039;ll enjoy the movie, no question, but the new movie alone is a difficult one for newcomers to follow, it has been so compressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You shouldn&#8217;t let the slight rewrite of the Guillam character prevent you from seeing  the movie. It&#8217;s a v. minor thing. Besides, if you look carefully, you&#8217;ll see le Carre himself in the movie, partying. The movie is a wonderful evocation of the 1970s; so much brown, for instance!</p>
<p>Also, make sure to read A Perfect Spy, which is his best book, most would agree. It is largely autobiographical and very moving and wonderfully written. Philip Roth is on record as saying it&#8217;s the best postwar novel in English, or some such.  </p>
<p>And finally, do whatever it takes to find a copy of the original BBC productions of Tinker, Tailor and Smiley&#8217;s People. They run around 5 hours but they are easily the best &#8220;TV&#8221; you will ever see. I&#8217;ve watched them both 15 times and still enjoy every minute. The new Tinker movie, as le Carre himself said, has boiled down the ox into a bouillon cube, and in so doing, it has removed much of the characterization that makes the original story so rich. If you know the book, you&#8217;ll enjoy the movie, no question, but the new movie alone is a difficult one for newcomers to follow, it has been so compressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Short John le Carré Pangyeric (and a Rant) by Eric</title>
		<link>http://ericjnies.com/wordpress/?p=2145#comment-78772</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ericjnies.com/wordpress/?p=2145#comment-78772</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re welcome.  My advise is start with &#039;The Spy Who Came In From the Cold&#039; or &#039;A Perfect Spy&#039; and then move on to the Karla Trilogy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re welcome.  My advise is start with &#8216;The Spy Who Came In From the Cold&#8217; or &#8216;A Perfect Spy&#8217; and then move on to the Karla Trilogy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Short John le Carré Pangyeric (and a Rant) by Pamela Blair</title>
		<link>http://ericjnies.com/wordpress/?p=2145#comment-78769</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Blair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ericjnies.com/wordpress/?p=2145#comment-78769</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m adding him to my list of authors to familiarize myself with... as soon as I find some free time. Thanks Eric!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m adding him to my list of authors to familiarize myself with&#8230; as soon as I find some free time. Thanks Eric!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

